In-house hire

Structured by AI vs hiring a developer

A full-time engineer on your payroll — the highest-commitment option, and the one that gives you the most control.

What hiring a developer is genuinely good at

Total control, deep context on your business over time, and someone whose whole week belongs to you. For a business with enough continuous engineering work to fill a full-time role, this is genuinely the right answer.

Where it falls short for a growing business

You cannot hire a fraction of a good engineer. Below that threshold you are paying full-time for part-time need, and a single junior with no system around them tends to produce a pile of half-finished internal tools.

CapabilityStructured by AIhiring a developer
Monthly cost From $997 $9,000+ fully loaded
Time until the first useful output Within 7 days 2–4 months to hire and ramp
You manage them day to day No — you message directly Yes
Breadth across web, data, automation and AI Yes Whatever that one person's stack is
Platform already built and running Yes — week one ships No — starts from an empty repository
Full-time attention on your business alone No — throughput is capped per tier Yes — a real strength
Sits in your office, in your meetings No Yes — a real strength

Typical US salary $120–160k, roughly $9,000+/month once employer costs are included — before recruiting time and before you have managed anyone. Market range, not a figure from our clients.

To be fair: If you genuinely have forty hours a week of engineering work and the budget for it, hire someone. A full-time engineer who knows your business deeply will out-deliver any outside arrangement, and we would tell you that on the call.

See the platform you'd be starting from

This is the difference the comparison above keeps coming back to: with hiring a developer, week one starts from nothing. Here it starts from software that is already running.